5/16/2023 0 Comments Crossword quiz pop culture sports![]() ![]() Commentaryĭavid French, in Times Opinion: “It is entirely appropriate to ask any judge difficult questions during the question and answer session after a speech. “While free speech isn’t easy or comfortable, it’s necessary for democracy,” Steinbach wrote.īelow, my colleague Ian Prasad Philbrick has compiled a selection of commentary on the episode. ![]() She said that she was trying to de-escalate the situation and noted that she defended Duncan’s right to speak during her remarks. The latest: Tirien Steinbach - the associate dean who rose to speak during the event and is now on leave - published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal yesterday explaining her position. It stops when we choose to replace condemnation with curiosity, invective with inquiry.” Martinez also wrote: “The cycle of degenerating discourse won’t stop if we insist that people we disagree with must first behave the way we want them to … The cycle stops when we recognize our responsibility to treat each other with the dignity with which we expect to be met. Stanford, she vowed, will not become “an echo chamber that ill prepares students to go out into and act as effective advocates in a society that disagrees about many important issues.” ![]() ![]() “The First Amendment does not give protesters a ‘heckler’s veto,’” Martinez, the law dean, wrote in her memo. Now, though, Stanford seems to be drawing a line in defense of free speech. Stanford itself allows students to file anonymous complaints against other students, including for speech. A Princeton student lost her leadership position on a sports team after privately expressing an opinion about policing. Hamline University in Minnesota effectively fired a teacher who showed a 14th-century painting of the Prophet Muhammad in an art history class. Over the past few years, some American universities have seemed to back away from their historical support for free speech. And it seems possible that the episode may affect the larger debate over free speech on campuses. On Wednesday, Martinez wrote a 10-page public memo criticizing students’ behavior at the judge’s talk and announcing a mandatory half-day session on freedom of speech for all law students.īut even many people who disagree with Duncan’s views have been bothered by the Stanford students’ behavior. Students responded to the apology with a protest during Martinez’s class on constitutional law. Stanford’s president, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, and its law school dean, Jenny Martinez, have apologized to Duncan. The associate dean has been placed on leave. “For many people here, your work has caused harm,” she told him.Īfter Duncan described his experience in a Wall Street Journal essay last week, the episode has received national attention and caused continuing turmoil at Stanford. When he asked Stanford administrators to calm the crowd, the associate dean for diversity, equity and inclusion walked to the lectern and instead began her remarks by criticizing him. One protester called for his daughters to be raped, Duncan said. Students frequently interrupted him with heckling. Stuart Kyle Duncan - a federal appeals court judge appointed by Donald Trump - visited Stanford Law School this month to give a talk. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |